Monday, May 20, 2013

Memorial Day: It's Not About Militarism


Distinguish between honoring our war dead and perpetuating militarism

I love how Indianapolis pulls out all the stops on Memorial Day weekend.  With the eyes of the world on our city on Sunday, there'll be plenty of pageantry and patriotic fervor to spread around.  No city has a greater responsibility, then, to accurately frame what Memorial Day honors.

As it is currently observed, the holiday appears mostly a celebration of American military prowess.  Military might is prominent at all our big events, from military bands and troops marching in parade to the latest military hardware proudly on display to a bone-rattling fly-over of military jets at the singing of our national anthem before the race begins.

God, guns, and guts will together be praised.  In the eyes of our youth, a distinct but misshapen impression will form: Memorial Day is about recognizing military might and honoring those who fight for us.  Secondary false assumptions will be implanted: This is the primary way we preserve our freedoms and ensure democracy.  This is the way it's always been.  And this is the way it always must be.

But the intention of Memorial Day is to honor all who died in America’s wars, not to celebrate militarism or bless war.  It’s clear from the inception of “Decoration Day” in 1868 by General John Logan and its post-WWI promotion by Ms. Moina Michael that the focus was to honor our war dead, particularly by decorating their graves and graciously supporting the many widows and orphans war leaves in its wake.

Though routinely disregarded, the distinction between memorializing our war dead and celebrating militarism is critical.  Instead letting the holiday be co-opted to perpetuate militarism, let us resolutely focus on honoring those who have given their lives in our nation’s conflicts.  Reverently consider the cost of even one soldier’s life and its impact in lost potential, relationships, creativity, and community contribution over a generation.

This Memorial Day is an opportunity to consider: given the cost in these precious lives, we must find a better way, not just repeat the past again and again.  War--and those whose lives are snuffed out or haunted by it--gives us every indication that we have not yet explored or employed our best intellectual, spiritual and material resources for preventing or addressing conflicts.  

The Memorial Day holiday affords us an opportunity to contemplate how far we have to go as a nation--and as a human family--in transforming our means of defending liberty, advancing democracy, and procuring justice for all.


NOTE: This post was published as a "Letter to the Editor" in the Friday, May 28, 2010 edition of the Indianapolis Star


John Franklin Hay 
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA 
www.indybikehiker.com 
www.twitter.com/indybikehiker 
indybikehiker@gmail.com

Sunday, May 19, 2013

Pentecost

My poem for the celebration of Christian Pentecost

How shall we celebrate
this occasion called Pentecost,
when the Holy Spirit poured out
upon the church?

Shall we decorate it
with props and pageants
and trinkets and trivia?

Shall we pine for the past,
longing to have experienced
its original wonders?

Shall we yearn for tomorrow,
praying to reproduce
its manifestations?

Shall we sing ourselves into
a frenzy and call our delirium
Spirit baptism?

Shall we preach Holy Spirit
doctrine until we think
more orthodoxly?

How shall we celebrate
this day on which the Spirit
of Truth descended?

Let us celebrate
with open hearts,
with sharpened minds,
with yielded and God-hungry lives,
with expectation of the unexpected
and surprising grace
which challenges our choices
and turns our world
upside down with love.


Graphic is "Pentecost: Fire and Breath" by Jan Richardson from The Painted Prayerbook

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Pentecost for Main Street

Harlem street lawyer/lay theologian William Stringfellow contextualizes Pentecost, which is celebrated on May 19 this year.

NOT PRIVATE BUT PUBLIC. "...As a matter of history and theology, the biblical happening most pertinent to the baptism of the Spirit is, manifestly, Pentecost. The scene is not private but quite public; it is not individualistic but notorious, not idiosyncratic but scandalous; and onlookers are said to behold Pentecost as provocative and controversial; it appears to have been an offense to the ruling authorities."

TRANSCENDING DISTINCTIONS. "Central in the experience of the power of the Holy Spirit among the disciples, both commonly and severally, is a transcendence of worldly distinction (as race, age, sex, class, occupation, nationality, language, tongue) that anticipates the eschatological consummation of the whole of fallen creation in the Kingdom of God."

RESTORING ORIGINAL PERSONHOOD. "Simultaneously, in Pentecost, each person receives the renewal of human gifts and capabilities, the restoration, as it were, of one's original personhood, a reconciliation with and within self in utterly intimate detail happening within the environment of each person's reconciliation with the rest of humanity and the whole of created life throughout time."

PERSONAL AND COSMIC. "These same aspects of Pentecost--the most intensely personal and the cosmic and ultimate--become, ever after, the marks of authentic and credible conversion of the baptism of the Spirit. When a person nowadays can be said to be baptized of the Holy Spirit, it means that the person is, verily, incorporated into the experience of Pentecost."


Quotes are from A Keeper of the Word: Selected Writings of William Stringfellow edited by Bill Wylie Kellerman, Eerdmans, 1994

John Franklin Hay 
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA 
www.indybikehiker.com 
www.twitter.com/indybikehiker 
indybikehiker@gmail.com

Saturday, May 11, 2013

Can I Believe it All Again Today?

Frederick Buechner prods us to plumb our belief to reach a deeper, heartier "Yes!"

MERELY SPRITIUAL PLASTIC SURGERY? "If anybody starts talking to me about religious commitment, I may listen politely, but what I'd like to answer him with is a few monosyllables that don't bear repeating here in the midst of the holy community. If you tell me Christian commitment is a thing that has happened to you once and for all like some kind of spiritual plastic surgery, I say you're either pulling the wool over your own eyes or trying to pull it over mine. Every morning you should wake up in your bed and ask yourself: 'Can I believe it all again today?'"

NEW YORK TIMES & THE BIBLE--SIDE BY SIDE. "No, better still, don't ask it till after you've read the New York Times, till after you've studied that daily record of the world's brokenness and corruption, which should always stand side by side with your Bible. Then ask yourself if you can believe in the Gospel of Jesus Christ again for that particular day. If your answer's always 'yes,' then you probably don't know what believing means."

LAUGHTER OF WONDERFUL INCREDULITY. "At least five times out of ten the answer should be 'no' because the 'no' is as important as the 'yes,' maybe more so. The 'no' is what proves you're human in case you should ever doubt it. And then, if some morning the answer happens to be really 'yes,' it should be a 'yes' that's choked with confession and tears and ... great laughter--not a beatific smile, but the laughter of wonderful incredulity."


John Franklin Hay 

Indianapolis, Indiana, USA 
www.indybikehiker.com 
www.twitter.com/indybikehiker 
indybikehiker@gmail.com

Sunday, May 5, 2013

Without a Community

Like 'The Man Without a Country,' have we become neighbors without a community?

From afar, we gaze at the horizon:
a shining city, vigorous in diversity,
shimmers mirage-like across the water,
beyond our longing reach.

We wonder how it slipped away,
how, following modest success,
pursuing permissible desires,
we drifted from what once held us.

From our place of alienation
in the middle of muchness
our satiated dissatisfaction senses
the absence of a buoying presence.

As The Man Without a Country,
condemned to a life adrift,
have we become neighbors
without community?

We claim to have said nothing seditious;
no outright dereliction of duty,
no AWOL abandonment,
no seduction by an enemy.

Heady aspirations and a penchant
for an ordered, controlled aesthetic
trumped what, for its discordant disparities,
resonated vibrantly in connected lives.

We moved upward and away,
outward and beyond to pleasant places
known more for sanitized sameness
than salty neighbors and complex diversities.

Changing places like musical chairs,
we did not consider our absence
a matter of any consequence,
nor feel the claim of our new locale.

Do these environs require less than what we left?
So long as one routinely mows the lawn
and keeps respectfully to oneself,
the façade of a safe neighborhood holds.

Repeatedly, we congratulate ourselves
on having plenty of room and
spacious surroundings in which to
entertain ourselves at our whims.

But in the glow of endless shows
and a million ads trumpeting our lack
we discover ourselves to be alone,
drifting anchorless in a stagnant sea.

Not knowing we were given to each other
to clothe a community with grace,
we ripped ourselves away from a fabric
intricately woven of people and place.

Late we learn the value of a house
is measured in caring neighbors
instead of state-of-the-art features
and steadily escalating equity.

Separated by miles and years,
the gifts of place and neighbor
beckon beyond narrowed circles
and insulating boundaries.

Though we have drifted far,
the rudder that steers us away
would bring community close
if we had the courage to risk again.


John Franklin Hay 
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA 
www.indybikehiker.com 
www.twitter.com/indybikehiker 
indybikehiker@gmail.com

Saturday, May 4, 2013

Crossing Urban Borders

For some, border crossing is unwitting; for others, it is intentional and redemptive. 

I penned the following piece after reflecting on a passage in John's gospel that begins: "Jesus had to go through Samaria..." In the story, Jesus choses intentionally to cross a significant cultural border not simply for the sake of expedient travel, but to encounter neighbors his followers otherwise would have avoided. I think about the daily challenges and learning opportunities of border crossing afforded all of us who live in a metropolitan area.

Driving my car, I cross a border,
with hardly a notice
slice through historic turf
that defined and defied
urban neighbors for years.

More unmarked boundaries
pass beneath my wheels.
In another era they would have
separated white from black,
native-born from immigrant,
rich from poor.

Insulated, I crisscross the city--
mobile, transient, unfettered--
on freeways that bypass realities,
offering commuter illusions
of debt-free passage and place.

To one, this passing cityscape
appears an unbounded horizon.
To another, it is precariously cut
and quartered territories--
staked, claimed, developed,
defended, abandoned, rehabbed.

One travels in and out of the urban core
unwittingly (except relief
that one does not reside here).
Another moves among these neighborhoods
acutely aware of spirit and place,
in reverence for soulful struggles.

One uses the city and retreats.
Another embraces its rhythms.
One merely consumes its resources.
Another, fueled by its complexities,
dares to steward what one still
seeks to understand.

We all cross these borders,
daily traverse a living polis
layered with polarity and paradox,
pulsating with power for shalom,
calling each to love the whole--
honoring one neighbor at a time.



John Franklin Hay 
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA 
www.indybikehiker.com 
www.twitter.com/indybikehiker 
indybikehiker@gmail.com

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Upside of Urban Living


Ray Bakke invites families to live in urban communities with benefits that far outweigh liabilities

These quotes are by Ray Bakke from an online article. Bakke, author of The Urban Christian and director of Urban Associates, resides in Chicago.

LEARN TO GET ALONG. "Our cities are famous for violence and strife. But I see them as R&D units, where different kinds of people are learning to get along. Whites, Blacks, Muslims, Jews, Arabs, Christians -- people with different languages and cultures are crafting new ways to live and communicate, to work and raise their children. It is possible to construct a life of denial and avoidance. But once you've hidden your kids away in a gated community, how will you educate them to have perspective? Cities expose us to perspectives that are important for the times in which we live."

CHALLENGE: CULTURAL DISTANCE. "The real challenge facing the world is not geographic distance but cultural distance. I think of Jackson, Mississippi as a father to Chicago, because a million and a half black people from Mississippi came here. Poland is our mother, because 840,000 Poles came to Chicago -- 100,000 more Poles than San Francisco has people. We have all kinds of cultures in our cities. How are we going to live together and work together?"

LOOK FOR SOLUTIONS. "Stop looking at the city as if it were just a problem -- with poor, locked-out people. That's seeing only the victim. See the city as an R&D unit. I've done consultations in more than 200 cities. When people in those cities ask for help, I say, 'Most of what you need to know is already in your city.' I bring together the best models of urban ministry, and we all teach each other what we're learning."

NETWORKS MAKE CHANGE. "I used to go to conferences where we'd hear famous experts tell us how to do things. That model brought people together, but the audience was passive. What we do is get people together, connect needs with resources, and build the bridges that make change happen. We link people to each other and turn them into associates. We walk alongside them, encourage and mentor them, and, if possible, secure grants for them."

THE POWER OF OPTIMISM. "Cities today are famous for their violence. But what amazes me is that the city wakes up in the morning, goes to bed at night, and is as quiet as it is. I'm amazed that the subways still run, that so many people still say 'Hi' on the street -- and that... living in the city can shape our children for the better. We get to introduce them to the cultures of the world. Living in the city is a great experience that offers tremendous advantages. We need to reflect on these advantages more often than we do."

Read the full article on Bakke.


John Franklin Hay 
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA 
www.indybikehiker.com 
www.twitter.com/indybikehiker 
indybikehiker@gmail.com

Friday, April 26, 2013

Learning in Leading

Warren Bennis' insights on leading focus on the internal work of the leader

I find myself returning every now and then to Warren Bennis’ little book On Becoming a Leader (Addison Wesley, 1989). The following quote is from the chapter “Moving Through Chaos.”

INNOVATION AND INTUITION. “A leader is, by definition, an innovator. He [sic] does things other people haven’t done or don’t do. He does things in advance of other people. He makes new things. He makes old things new. Having learned from the past, he lives in the present, with one eye on the future. And each leader pulls it all together in a different way. To do that…leaders must be right-brain, as well as left-brain thinkers. They must be intuitive, conceptual, synthesizing, and artistic.”

LEARN, LEAD, GROW. “Learning to lead is, on one level, learning to manage change…and that includes changes within the leader. One of a leader’s principal gifts is his ability to use his experiences to grow in office. The leader does it better and better and better, but is never satisfied. The leader knows better than anyone that the fundamental problems of life are insoluble, but he persists anyway, and he continues to learn.”

OUR CURRICULUM: ADVERSITY. “Leaders learn by leading, and they learn best by leading in the face of obstacles. As weather shapes mountains, so problems make leaders. Difficult bosses, lack of vision and virtue in the executive suite, circumstances beyond their control, and their own mistakes have been the leaders’ basic curriculum.”



John Franklin Hay 
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA 
www.indybikehiker.com 
www.twitter.com/indybikehiker 
indybikehiker@gmail.com

Thursday, April 25, 2013

17 Practices for Sustainable Communities and Economies


Wendell Berry's common sense and counterintuitive practices that cultivate community and local economy



Almost twenty years ago, Wendell Berry shared 17 steps to help local communities become healthy and sustainable. I try to take these to heart, put them into practice, encourage them institutionally and systemically. They are:

1. Always ask of any proposed change or innovation: What will this do to our community? How will this affect our common wealth?

2. Always include local nature - the land, the water, the air, the native creatures - within the membership of the community.

3. Always ask how local needs might be supplied from local sources, including the mutual help of neighbors.

4. Always supply local needs first (and only then think of exporting products - first to nearby cities, then to others).

5. Understand the ultimate unsoundness of the industrial doctrine of 'labor saving' if that implies poor work, unemployment, or any kind of pollution or contamination.

6. Develop properly-scaled value-adding industries for local products to ensure that the community does not become merely a colony of national or global economy.

7. Develop small-scale industries and businesses to support the local farm and/or forest economy.

8. Strive to supply as much of the community's own energy as possible.

9. Strive to increase earnings (in whatever form) within the community for as long as possible before they are paid out.

10. Make sure that money paid into the local economy circulates within the community and decrease expenditures outside the community.

11. Make the community able to invest in itself by maintaining its properties, keeping itself clean (without dirtying some other place), caring for its old people, and teaching its children.

12. See that the old and young take care of one another. The young must learn from the old, not necessarily and not always in school. There must be no institutionalised childcare and no homes for the aged. The community knows and remembers itself by the association of old and young.

13. Account for costs now conventionally hidden or externalized. Whenever possible, these must be debited against monetary income.

14. Look into the possible uses of local currency, community-funded loan programs, systems of barter, and the like.

15. Always be aware of the economic value of neighborly acts. In our time, the costs of living are greatly increased by the loss of neighborhood, which leaves people to face their calamities alone.

16. A rural community should always be acquainted and interconnected with community-minded people in nearby towns and cities.

17. A sustainable rural economy will depend on urban consumers loyal to local products. Therefore, we are talking about an economy that will always be more cooperative than competitive.

Read these from their source the Utne Reader online.


John Franklin Hay 
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA 
www.indybikehiker.com 
www.twitter.com/indybikehiker 
indybikehiker@gmail.com

Sunday, April 21, 2013

The Long View

Reinhold Niebuhr's perspective helps me stay focused and faithful when immediate initiatives seem insufficient or partial

I ran across this excerpt of Reinhold Niebuhr, quoted from his book The Irony of American History. The excerpt is in a book on urban ministry titled Redeeming the City and the authors place the statementat the beginning of a chapter that challenges change agents to address systems with principles, patience and persistence over a lifetime.


"Nothing that is worth doing can be achieved in our lifetime; therefore we must be saved by hope.

Nothing which is true or beautiful or good makes complete sense in any immediate context of history; therefore we must be saved by faith.

Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.

No virtuous act is quite as virtuous from the standpoint of our friend and foe as it is from our standpoint. Therefore, we must be saved by the final form of love which is forgiveness."


John Franklin Hay 
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA 
www.indybikehiker.com 
www.twitter.com/indybikehiker 
indybikehiker@gmail.com

Thursday, April 18, 2013

A Story Behind the 'What Saved Grace?' Story

Every story has a backstory. Here's the story that sparked my journey toward writing this novel 

Several years ago, I was elected President of the Homeless Network of Indianapolis. HNI was a rather raucous, unfunded consortium of homeless advocates, service providers and government
agency staffers. We came together to raise awareness of the growing issue of homelessness and to try to better address it. The Homeless Network eventually morphed into a fully staffed intermediary organization and was renamed CHIP -- the Coalition for Homelessness Intervention and Prevention.

I was pretty young and naive when I started participating in the Homeless Network. I joined in because the church and ministry I served was reaching out to homeless folks with a daily lunch program and winter contingency shelter. When I attended my first few Homeless Network meetings, I was deeply impressed by the capacity of the people in the room and the range of compassionate organizations at the table. Granted, we were diverse and our approaches were different, but we were committed.  Given this capacity and commitment, I was sure we could help our city max the issue of homelessness in no time.

But the more I participated in the Homeless Network--the more I watched different service providers operate, the more I listened to different advocates articulate--the more I realized we were not at all on the same page. In fact, our approaches to addressing and ending homelessness were all over the map--even conflicting, competing and counterproductive.

At that time, the leadership of two faith-based shelters would not even talk to each other. Some outreach workers offered help to homeless people in order to preach to them and convert them, convinced that only a spiritual change would end their homelessness. Other outreach workers tangled with the preachers, asserting that that Jesus stuff distracted from the real issues. Some of our Homeless Network participants focused on advocacy--changing bad policies and protesting for fair treatment.

While our Homeless Network agreed on helping homeless neighbors, at times that was about all we could agree on.  Our approaches to compassion, care, healing and change seemed irreconcilably disparate. This realization was initially disillusioning to me. How could people who claimed to care so much be so far apart in the ways we cared? I had been trained by Parker J. Palmer to learn from disillusionment (to be dis-illusioned, to see reality as it is, he says, is a good thing). So I tried to do that.

The more I understood about each advocate, caregiver, outreach worker and organization, the more clearly their particular approaches to compassion emerged. Some tended to approach homelessness as rescuers. They saw the primary issue as internal--as spiritual brokenness or mental illness. They provided shelter, recovery programs, and short-term relief. Others tended to approach homelessness as service providers and advocates. Instead of focusing on personal issues, they focused on what was right or wrong with the system--with policies, the government, institutions, or the community at large. Still others, I noticed, focused on less direct--but still effective--interventions, like transitional, supported and long-term housing, food co-ops and access to healthcare.

As I learned about each homeless advocate or service or housing provider, I reflected on my own understanding of compassion. What did I think constituted a valid, holistic approach to changed lives, a changed system, and a changed community? While I was proud of what I was engaged in and what my church was doing in response to the homelessness of some, I recognized its limits and pitfalls. I was also drawn to other dimensions of care and expressions of hope I observed. So, I eventually realized that I was not only an actor in this range of care, but one who was being challenged and changed by it.

It seemed to me that while there were real downsides, there was a degree of validity in each approach to addressing homelessness. Was there one comprehensive approach? I could imagine that, but others could or would not. What prevented a rescuer from appreciating the work of a service provider--and vice versa? How could profound differences and divisions be bridged, if at all? What more did I need to know to better understand the problem and work toward a common solution?

This was the creative mix that opened my heart and mind to explore the beauty and complexity of compassion. I brought this "problem" into my studies in a doctoral program I entered. The reading, conversations and guidance I enjoyed during that period helped me better understand and frame what I was experiencing. I decided to shine a light on the assumptions and underpinnings of compassion in hopes of becoming more responsible in my own actions. I also decided to lift up my own journey in compassion to others in the hope that others would learn, grow and contribute to ever more responsible and redemptive social actions.

That's the backstory of the fiction narrative I crafted. 'What Saved Grace?' is now available in all ebook formats from Amazon, Barnes & Noble online, iTunes and Smashwords. I hope you'll read it. I think it will challenges--if not change--the way you view compassion and act in caring response to others.

  • Get 'What Saved Grace?' via Smashwords - all ebook formats (Kindle, Nook, etc.)
  • Get 'What Saved Grace?' via Amazon - for Kindle and Kindle apps for smartphones, tablets, PCs and MACs
  • Get 'What Saved Grace?' via Barnes & Noble online - for Nook
  • Get 'What Saved Grace?' for iBooks at the iTunes Store
  • Sorry, 'What Saved Grace?' is not available in print (we'll first see how ebook sales go.)


John Franklin Hay
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
www.indybikehiker.com
www.twitter.com/indybikehiker
indybikehiker@gmail.com


Thursday, April 11, 2013

Rebuilding Urban Neighborhoods from the Inside Out

Principles for comprehensive community development and urban neighborhood renewal

I’m convinced there’s never been a better time to invest in urban neighborhoods. Having served in a range of community and faith-based organizations in urban communities, I recently delved afresh into readings, research and conversations related to urban community revitalization. I am inspired by emerging possibilities.

Urban community development is a fascinating arena, full of hope and challenge. For all its promise, it's not an arena for the faint of heart; lots of crosscurrents are at work in the polis. At the same time, organizations, communities and individuals are attempting and expressing the very best in urban community development.

As I’ve examined the underpinnings of organizations and initiatives that are attempting to revitalize urban core communities, and as I’ve explored best practices resources, a few principles emerge for me. I hope to have further opportunities to articulate and shape these in practice, but I want to share them here--even if in embryonic form. It seems to me that these ideas apply not just to urban neighborhoods, but to more difficult and complex suburban ones. This is about as close to a community manifesto as I get.

 
1. All who desire urban community renewal and vital neighborhoods should consider the significant non-monetary costs and investments: relationship building, careful process, time, personal challenge, disappointments, agitations. These investments payoff well, but they should not be overlooked or avoided.


2. There is a way to rehab and build houses that brings neighbors into emerging relationship and grows healthy neighborhoods. If houses and landmark buildings are going to be rehabbed and restored anyway, why not do so in a way that builds relationships and makes community itself a landmark? Instead of following the pattern of most real estate developers, follow--and insist on--a process that reflects the community-building mission. 


3. It is easier to build houses and buildings than build enduring relationships and integrity with neighbors. Without these, community is just a place and a concept, not a relational reality. Investment in urban neighborhood renewal needs to account for and give attention to good process and relationship development with and among neighbors and organizations.


4. Good design and master planning can go halfway to develop inviting and livable urban neighborhoods, but it needs to be met halfway with relationship building. We like the aesthetics of well-designed structures in relationship to others. But it is the aesthetic of caring neighbors makes a community shine.


5. More people than we care to admit have lost their sense of place and community—and not just in urban neighborhoods. Being a consumer, patron and spectator doesn't begin to satisfy the desire to belong, contribute and shape the future that lies at the heart of all of us.  The continuing effort to include, invite, welcome, make room, recognize and celebrate—drawing the circle ever wider—brings all into a new and hopeful social reality.


6. Organizationally, nonprofits gain trust with neighbors and stakeholders when they act with humility, gratitude and creativity. These trump the hubris, expert-itis and authority plays that too frequently spill over into the arena from bad for-profit and public sector actors. Community-based organizations are most effective when their collective way of being is reflected in an “alongsideness” with neighbors and neighborhood groups.


7. While government and for-profit sectors are partners and stakeholders in urban community revitalization, they do not dream of community, look out for it, or seek to preserve or restore it like neighbors can--and do. Though they are critical stakeholders, their self-interest is different than a neighbor’s or neighborhood’s. If urban communities are to be restored, community and faith-based nonprofits and fourth-sector associations of neighbors must articulate and fight for their dream. They can welcome partners, but they must lead the way.


8. Doing the right thing in the right way is one thing in the for-profit and public sector, but the “right thing” (leadership) and the “right ways” (management) may be quite different in an urban community redevelopment setting. It is a mistake to impose a “business knows best” grid on community-based initiatives. Instead, look for collaborations and partnerships in which all sectors learn from each other in this fascinating arena of urban community renewal. Though the process and path may be different than the one for-profit or public sector partners would prefer, the mutually-desired outcome of invested, livable, sustainable urban communities are the better, long-term outcome.


9. Renewing and taking seriously the principles and practices of Asset-Based Community Development can reinvigorate urban planning protocols and practices that say “asset-based” but may have deteriorated into satisfying report forms and getting projects completed on time. Recovery of rudimentary ABCD practices catapults community development toward its intended reality.

 
10. Organizations, partners, neighborhoods, and neighbors find synergy when they cross borders and build bridges between and among themselves. Connecting in every direction, like learning in every direction, creates common ground and possibilities for community realization (with its natural efficiencies and power) that could not otherwise be attempted.


11. Pressing challenges of urban neighborhood revitalization remain: (1) grappling head-on with the sources and impacts of economic poverty, (2) access to livable-wage employment and the education, readiness and advocacy which make that possible, (3) addressing reentry for thousands of ex-felons in a way that offers livable-wage work and reintegration without unreasonable life-long barriers and stigmas, and (4) cooperative and responsive public safety. I am convinced that creative solutions and pathways forward will be found and best shaped from within urban neighborhoods who put ABCD to work.


John Franklin Hay, D.Min., is Executive Director of Indy-East Asset Development and Associate Faculty at Indiana University’s School for Public and Environmental Affairs (IUPUI).

John Franklin Hay 

Indianapolis, Indiana, USA 
www.indybikehiker.com 
www.twitter.com/indybikehiker 
indybikehiker@gmail.com

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Hell and Heaven in a Bowl of Soup

A parable of community's possibilities for all

Not sure where I read this illustration, but I've shared it numerous times in a wide range of settings. It's one of my favorite ways to convey the essence of community.

Hell, it is said, it like a big bowl of delicious soup. The bowl is 6 feet in diameter and people are standing elbow to elbow all around it. Each person has a 4-foot long spoon, which they are dipping into the great-looking, great-smelling soup. But each person around the bowl of soup is emaciated, starving, agitated and angry. Why? Because every time they try to serve themselves, awkwardly attempting to manipulate the spoon back to their mouths, most of the spoonful of nutrition spills back into the bowl in the process.

Heaven, it is said, is the same delicious soup in a 6-foot diameter bowl. All the people, standing elbow to elbow around it, each have a 4-foot long spoon. Each person is well-fed and satisfied, because, instead of trying serve themselves, they are dipping their spoons into the soup and lifting it up to the mouths of those standing on the opposite side of the bowl.

There is plenty of soup for everyone; all we need to be satisfied and know abundance is already present in any community. But we will be satisfied and access that abundance only if we stop trying to serve ourselves and begin to use what we have been given to serve our neighbors--and let them serve us. 


John Franklin Hay
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA 
www.indybikehiker.com 
www.twitter.com/indybikehiker 
indybikehiker@gmail.com

Monday, April 8, 2013

Community-Building Wisdom of J. Irwin Miller


Why and how we build matters -- more for people and community than for impressions

J. Irwin Miller in his Columbus, Indiana, backyard.
Photo by John Loengard, LIFE, 1967
ARCHITECTURAL GIANT.  Indiana lost a great mind and spirit when J. Irwin Miller died in 2004.  Miller used his influence to shape Columbus, Indiana into an “architectural capital."  Miller's influence is not just in buildings, but in ways of seeing and thinking and caring about people and places and organizations.  The following excerpts are from a speech he gave in Indianapolis about twenty years ago.  This is rich food for thought for community builders.

MAKE THE MOST OF SMALL OPPORTUNITIES.  “Your chance is to be found in a continuing succession of small, manageable events - little opportunities as well as the great ones.  Every time any public building is built, that building is a statement to anyone who uses it, anyone who passes by, as to what this city thinks about itself, what standards it sets for itself, what it aims to be.”

WHAT STATEMENTS DO OUR BUILDINGS MAKE?  “It matters not whether the building be a city hall, a museum, a school, a jail, a fire station, a parking garage, a park, or for that matter, new signage laws, exposed power lines, or the design of benches at bus stops.  Each, for good or ill, makes a statement.”

CREATE ENDURING MESSAGES.  “If the design and construction is clearly aimed to be the best it can be, that message is sent out every day, as long as the building or the park, or the ordinance stands.  If the design is ugly or routine and the construction shoddy, the message is that nobody really cares.  Nothing you do or build is too small or too insignificant not to do well.”

AIM FOR THE BEST EVERY DAY.  “The opportunity to aim for the best we know how to do comes up every year, every month.  The cumulative impact of caring enough to seize each opportunity, great and small, year after year, can change any city for the better within a generation.”

EXCELLENCE IS CONTAGIOUS.  “It does something else too.  It generates among others a desire to aim for the best: Churches build better.  Merchants build better.  The sights of builders of private homes are raised.  Interest in fine parks arises.  Streets become more attractive.  People plant more trees.”

INCIPIENT INFLUENCES.  “And in the invisible --  which maybe is more important in the long run -- determination for better education, for the elimination of crime, and drugs, and poverty, and teen pregnancy is nourished.  Young people aim higher in their own education and life goals.”

THE POWER OF EXAMPLE.  “You may, of course, not see convincing proof in your lifetime.  But, if you believe in the power of example, then you must believe that such an example, begun in many small ways, in deprived even more than in affluent areas, steadily pursued, handed on to succeeding generations, will over time make this a most remarkable city indeed.  You will have made a difference.”

AVOID MANYNESS.  “A few cautions now. And this comes out of my own local experience.  Avoid some of today's common reasons given for support of good design, support of the arts, support of humane projects, many of the ‘good things’ Euripides was thinking of.”

PEOPLE COME FIRST.  “Your concern will fail if it arises primarily because you are convinced it will be ‘good for business.’  It will be good for business, but people come first.  Business exists to serve people, not the other way around.  If ‘good for business’ is your reason, then the first down year in the economy will turn your attention away from such things.  They will be treated as ornaments easily foregone in bad times.”

HANG BEING “NUMBER ONE.”  “Your concern will also fail if it arises primarily because ‘We want to be No. 1.’  When the going gets tough, there is always the temptation to proclaim ‘We ARE No. 1.’  And to turn to matters that require less staying power.”

AVOID COMPARISON-MOTIVATED ACTION.  “Your concern will fail if it arises primarily because you want to say ‘We've got culture too.’  This is operating with your eyes enviously focused on some other fellow - not on the job at hand.”

GOOD FOR EVERYONE.  “Finally -- some encouragement.  Don't look over your shoulder at anyone.  Set your eyes on beginning to make your city a good city for all its members, a "home" for the least as well as for the greatest.  Realize that this goal will not be reached in your lifetime.”

LAY FOUNDATIONS.  “Don't try for instant ‘image.’  Instead emulate the cathedral builders of the 12th Century who were content simply to make great plans and to lay in their lifetimes no more than the footings and foundations.”

CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVE EVERYTHING.  “Next -- never miss an opportunity, however small, in respect to something that is going to be done anyway.  Try to see that it is done better than it would have been done, had you not stepped in.”

ATTACK INJUSTICE.  “Finally, never miss an opportunity to correct an obvious evil, an obvious injustice, great or small.  We approach justice in this world by attacking injustice.  We achieve beauty by attacking ugliness.”



John Franklin Hay 
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA 
www.indybikehiker.com 
www.twitter.com/indybikehiker 
indybikehiker@gmail.com